Register for Free
Post comments, receive updates via email, gain access to exclusive content, and more.
Spam Safe!
Peak Phosphorus
Phosphorus Matters
Compost, Food Shortages, Soil Composition, Soil Conservation, Soil Erosion & Contamination — by Marcin Gerwin
Part One: Closing the Phosphorus Cycle
NOTE: I have gone on about this in other threads, but this actually comes up with the numbers, and much more. MUST READ. Go to the source for the entire read.
Matrix.
|
|
It might sound ridiculous, but for every container of bananas, coffee, tea or cocoa imported, we should send back a shipment of a fluffy, earth-like smelling compost. Why is that? With each container of food we import nutrients taken up by plants from the soil. We import calcium, potassium, magnesium, boron, iron, zinc, molybdenum, copper and many others. One of the essential elements imported in food is phosphorus. For every ton of bananas we import 0.3 kg of phosphorus, for every ton of cocoa it’s 5 kg and for ton of coffee it’s 3.3 kg of phosphorus. Tea is a bit more complicated, because the amount of phosphorus depends on the origin of tea - for example in 1 ton of tea leaves harvested in Sri Lanka there are some 3.5 kg of phosphorus, while tea from South India contains 6.6 kg of phosphorus (1).
digg_url = http://permaculture.org.au/2009/01/14/ph...
reddit_url="http://permaculture.org.au/2009/01/14/phosphorus-matters/"Each
year some 13.5 million tons of bananas alone are exported around the
world (2), containing 4,000,000 kg of elemental phosphorus up taken by
the plants from tropical soils. And most of this phosphorus never comes
back to the soil it was removed from. Yes, but can’t the farmers
replace the nutrients lost using fertilizers? That’s what the
fertilizers are used for, are they not? Sure they can. Farmers can buy
a bag of ground phosphate rocks or guano (bird or bat droppings) or
even a bag of artificial fertilizer such as superphosphate if they
don’t farm organically. No problem. They can replace every kilogram of
phosphorus taken from the soil by plants and sent overseas with their
produce.
|
|
So, why should we send compost back on ships? This would add extra cost to the imported food and make it much more expensive! We should start closing nutrients cycle soon, because the world reserves of phosphate rocks, which are used for the production of phosphate fertilizers, are declining. They can be depleted even this century
<AND>
Closing the nutrients cycle
Ideally
the same amount of nutrients that left the farm should come back to it.
To achieve this goal we should compost or ferment all residues from
farms, food processing plants and households and make them available
for farmers. And yes, we need to compost urine and feces as well. There
are many types of compost toilets, including the simplest sawdust
toilet to the commercial types with electric fans. If handled properly
they don’t smell badly and the final product of the compost toilet is
just a plain ordinary compost. It can be collected in the city in
special containers, standing along the curb near the containers for
recycling glass and plastics. Joseph Jenkins’ “Humanure Handbook” is a great resource on the subject.
All organic waste can be collected as a part of a municipality recycling program and leftovers from the kitchen can be picked up weekly from the separate curbside container. For backyard gardeners and farmers who eat their own food there are many methods of composting to choose from – buckets, triangle cages, compost tumblers, worm composting, loose heaps or classic wooden containers. There are even composters which can be kept directly in the kitchen without any suspicious smells.
It seems also a good idea to extract carbon and hydrogen from the food residues in the form of biogas which is primarily methane (CH4). It can be used for cooking, heating, electricity generation or for powering vehicles. The exciting thing about biogas is that we don’t waste any of the minerals from the organic matter - carbon is taken by plants from the air in the form of carbon dioxide and hydrogen comes from water. After fermentation process in a biodigester the organic matter is still perfectly useful as a fertilizer.
If the resources of phosphate rocks become depleted this organic waste recycling program will be crucial for farmers. They will be able to buy or receive finished compost according to the amount of food they sold. It may sound absurd, but the content of phosphorus or other nutrients in crops may eventually be counted in the future, so that we can determine how much compost the farmer should receive. Ideally local food should be involved in this scheme to minimize transport needs. And what about the food from overseas farms like coffee or tea? Well, things get much more complicated here. Theoretically, we could exchange nutrients in the form of food, so that for every kilogram of coffee would send back wheat or barley with the equal content of phosphorus. What farmers can do now is to bring compost from the cities, where people eat imported food. The other option is sending compost back. Hmm… Wouldn’t it be just perfect to have a village scale economy where all nutrients would circulate without cars, trucks, cargo ships and complex municipality programs?
<MORE>
Peace on Terra http://damnthematrix.wordpress.com/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roeoz/
So many natural cycles have been broken that something has gotta give.
I'm only 30 and you can call me naive but if I had a lot of money I think I would invest in the land that used to be old garbage dumps and expect to cash in on those in about 30-50 years. My feelings are that once we start to hit 'peak everything' we're going to have to go back to where we wasted so much for so long.
On the same note I would also invest in research on creating fuel out of recycled plastics and how to make that technology as clean as possible. Hell, if we're going to hit peak oil why not make use of some of the stuff we didn't burn that's still lying around as plastics. I would also invest in soil reclamation/decontamination research.
I would do this on a few assumptions. First I think that there is so much garbage that will be worth digging up (mined) to be recycled (smelted). I will also assume that by then we'll be finding techno fixes (if invested as mentioned above) on how to be more innovative and efficient about recycling and soil reclamation/decontamination.
Just think of how rich those properties would be with all the crappy consumer goods we've been sending to landfills because our retarded systems make it cheaper and more convenient and socially acceptable to trash everything rather than consider the 3 Rs. Think of all the glass, think all kinds of metals, think compost from all the food waste. I consider dumps future gold mines!
If the world could spend some serious time and thought on finding ways to close the cycle of the materials we use(d) we could be looking at avoiding serious problems we will inevitably face on resource depletion. Maybe if we can find efficient and effective ways to manage these cycles which we are a major part of we won't have to deal with inevitable and horrible means of natural or unnatural population control.
We seem to have forgotten about the natural cycles because they haven't been convenient. It's time to start thinking about long term survival of our species (and others) beyond the current environmental movement surrounding Climate Change and/or Global Warming. If only the governments could inject trillions into that!
We have to remember that every single thing that every one of us does has possible ramifications for life on earth. We are all part of a web of events and choices that ultimately determine the future. - Jesus H. Chris (Propagandhi)
why not make use of some of the stuff we didn't burn that's still lying around as plastics. I would also invest in soil reclamation/decontamination research.
I would do this on a few assumptions. First I think that there is so much garbage that will be worth digging up (mined) to be recycled (smelted). I will also assume that by then we'll be finding techno fixes (if invested as mentioned above) on how to be more innovative and efficient about recycling and soil reclamation/decontamination.
Just think of how rich those properties would be with all the crappy consumer goods we've been sending to landfills because our retarded systems make it cheaper and more convenient and socially acceptable to trash everything rather than consider the 3 Rs. Think of all the glass, think all kinds of metals, think compost from all the food waste. I consider dumps future gold mines!
Ruhh, the problem with recycling - even before something ends up in a land fill - and especially with digging up already burried stuff is energy. Even for things that make it ecocomically feasable- ie you get paid enough to cover the cost of digging it up and transforming into something useful- the real test is EROEI, the energy return on energy invested. To go after plastics may never meet either criteria, so the thing to do is to stop using them in the first place.
The other issue with recycling is that it is only sustainable in a situation where use is declining. There is always some loss in the system. At present the loss is enormous, even in the most recycled of products such as PET bottles.
So while I totally agree with you that we need to keep the 3 Rs in mind, we also need to realize that it won't solve the whole problem, or even come close.
Cheers.
Peak phosphate
For example, our new report reveals that supplies of phosphate rock are running out faster than previously thought and that declining supplies and higher prices of phosphate are a new threat to global food security. ‘A rock and a hard place: Peak phosphorus and the threat to our food security’ highlights the urgent need for farming to become less reliant on phosphate rock-based fertiliser.
http://www.soilassociation.org/Default.aspx?TabId=1259




The message of literature is, "You are not alone." The message of propaganda is, "You are what we say you are."