Login for Registered Members:

Register for Free

Post comments, receive updates via email, gain access to exclusive content, and more.

the main problem with the globe

Subscribe to this feed
Bookmark and Share
24 replies [Last post]
Damnthematrix's picture
Damnthematrix
User offline. Last seen 1 hour 58 min ago. Offline
Diamond Member
Posts: 3910
Joined: 08/10/2008
the main problem with the globe

I picked this item from the 6/6 DD where I was going to reply, but thought it deserved its own thread.....

hunt4riches wrote:

I see the main problem with the globe to be over population combined with socialism, dictatorship and communism.

I read this last night before going to bed (local Australian time..) and gave it a lot of thought....  and I hope this post doesn't turn into a long rambling raving discourse, because in my opinion this statement just over simplifies things.  Remember, we live in a complex world..

No problem with over population, surely any follower of this site wouldn't be "here" if they couldn't see it.  But I'm afraid you left out another ism, and that's capitalism.  WHY I see ALL the "isms" as problems is because none of them are perfect, and far far from it....  Just like Humans really...

With over population, I would lay on the table the other big issue - over consumption, and capitalism encourages over consumption.  At the expense of perhaps yet again getting up Americans' noses, it's no surprise that the most Capitalistic country on Earth, the USA, is the one where over consumption is most rampant.  Before any of you get on your high horses, I am not saying this as criticism, it's merely an observation.  Worse, this culture of "big cars and McMansions" is spreading all over the world (well maybe not any more..), marketed by US styled advertising.  I see this happening here in Australia.  And I don't like it!

Americans just love their capitalism, this is obvious after following this site for nearly three years.  Yet, I now realise, there are loads of socialists there too, I have been following some of them, with some admiration I might add, because you have to be very courageous to be a socialist in America!

The reason there are different isms is because people are different.  Some, (like hunt4riches maybe?  I have to tell you I think that is an odd screen name that maybe one day you could explain to us...) have an inate drive to acquire power and wealth.  Others (yes, like ME!!) couldn't give a stuff about how much they own or how much they are worth.  Why anyone should feel entitled to own more than one of everything (and here I'm particularly thinking of big ticket items like houses and SUV's) is beyond me.....

hunt4riches wrote:
More or less of one of one or the other depending on where you hold the magnifying glass.  Right now we have to produce X (but need Z, and Z>X) to sustain Y.  Those who produce X are overworked and under compensated.  Most of the Y earn or produce nothing, and become the burden of the producers of X.  The producers of X slowly decide to simply 'stop working' because it is not worth a 12-hour-day effort for only a 4-hour-day return.  I joined the boat this year.  I no longer "work for the system".  I make my own money dealing rare coins, I pay what I believe to be a fair amount of taxes (and lets not sidetrack on that note...).  Seeing that close to 30% of my salary was being misappropriated through our failing system, I decided enough as enough, and just quit.  Now living off my savings, and the land.  It's amazong how many vegetables you can grow on a 6' x 12' balcony.

OK, so far so good.......  but maybe you'd like to explain just who is represented by X, Y, and Z.......?  I no longer work for the Matrix either, but I've rebooted my life so money is not so important, and in fact once TSHTF I am fairly sure I could live without any.  If you still need money, then I'm afraid you are still inside the system, because the system is all about money.  Trust me, living outside the Matrix is bloody hard, because just like in the movie it is everywhere.....

hunt4riches wrote:
Though I believe people have the right to live, I do NOT believe they have the right to unlimited medical care at the expense of others.  It should be strictly up to those with a surplus to donate, so that the "have nots" can "have".  Besides, where's the free healthcare for the 10,000 africans who probably died of starvation in africa while I wrote this?  Who were responsible to provide this to them?  who was gioing to work to provide the resources?

Good question.......  but you see, I could turn this around on you and say "I do NOT believe they have the right to unlimited home and car and and and and.... ownership".  Plus, I don't see many rich people "donating" enough to keep the poor going.  Otherwise there wouldn't be poor people!

hunt4riches wrote:
I think food stamps are a complete waste.  80% of the value of the stamps goes towards consumer advertising and packaging.  Sorry, but if you need food assistance - you get the basics.  Butter, flower, eggs, cheese, peanut butter.  Guess what?  YOU'RE POOR !!!  You don't get steak, cookies, chips and candy bars!

So your measure of well being is "steak, cookies, chips and candy bars"?  I'm amazed........

hunt4riches wrote:
Flipping the coin... let's face it, a taxless society doesn't move very fast. But a 50-60% taxed society moves even slower. 

We need slow.....  we need zero growth.  We need to change the way EVERYTHING is done, and getting hung up on taxation is plain silly.  If you don't like paying taxes, then live a tax free life!  I have almost achieved this now...  For instance, there's much talk about a Carbon Tax at the moment in Australia, but I have worked out that a $26/ton tax on our electricity consumption would add $4 a year to my tax burden...

hunt4riches wrote:
That's where we are today.  If low taxes means more open-road tolling, fine.  "if you use it, pay for it"  ...    that's how everything else on the planet works.  The maximim efficiency of an economy can only be as high as the percentage of non-government workers.  I'd say right now we're clacking on only two cylinders.  Something tells me when one of these goes, the last one remaining just won't cut it.

Post Peak Oil there won't be any cylinders.  Hunt, this is your fourth post here.  I don't think you "get" the Crash Course yet.  Go do it again please.

rhare's picture
rhare
User offline. Last seen 1 hour 54 min ago. Offline
Diamond Member
Posts: 1016
Joined: 03/30/2009
The US is not capitalistic.

Damnthematrix wrote:

Americans just love their capitalism, this is obvious after following this site for nearly three years.  Yet, I now realise, there are loads of socialists there too, I have been following some of them, with some admiration I might add, because you have to be very courageous to be a socialist in America!

This is where you are so completely out of touch with reality.  It may be called "capitalism" but it's not what we have in the US.  Just look at the basis for everything, the USD (Federal Reserve Note).  What are the mandates of the Fed:

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market Committee shall maintain long run growth of the monetary and credit aggregates commensurate with the economy's long run potential to increase production, so as to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.

Tell me, are any of those 3 stated goals capitalistic?  They sure all seem socialist to me.  And just like any socialist society, the US will fail because you eventually run out of productive members of the society to plunder.

 

rhare's picture
rhare
User offline. Last seen 1 hour 54 min ago. Offline
Diamond Member
Posts: 1016
Joined: 03/30/2009
Aren't you being just a bit misleading, leaving out a few facts?

Damnthematrix wrote:

For instance, there's much talk about a Carbon Tax at the moment in Australia, but I have worked out that a $26/ton tax on our electricity consumption would add $4 a year to my tax burden...

Ahh, just like any good socialist, you got yours from pludering others.  You've commented about how low your electric bill is because you plunder others to pay for it via massive solar subsidies.  Then you use the fact that your bill is ultra low to point out how little impact a carbon tax would have on you. Surprised

 

gregroberts
User offline. Last seen 1 week 4 days ago. Offline
Diamond Member
Posts: 1010
Joined: 10/06/2008
"there are loads of

"there are loads of socialists there too, I have been following some of them, with some admiration I might add,"

 For someone who does not like guns, you sure like to use them to force people to do what you think is good. (indirectly by using the govt that is).

darbikrash's picture
darbikrash
User is online Online
Gold Member
Posts: 490
Joined: 08/25/2009
Huh?

Really? The US is not Capitalistic? It’s just hilarious listening to the sincere protestations that what we really need is more Capitalism in America, because you know, what just happened to us in 2008, you see, this had nothing to do with Capitalism.

And here is where the tut-tut-tut and finger wagging starts, the hands begin waving and gesticulating widely, and  pronouncements are held forth that what we are seeing is not capitalism at all, no, it is (insert –ism of choice, preferably as a pejorative).

Now, a reasonably competent 8th grade civics student could discern that what passes for political economy in our country has about as much in common with Adam Smith’s version of Wealth of Nations as the William Burroughs’ Naked Lunch, but the reasons why this is so requires us to be informed by history, which tells us clearly, and unequivocally that Capitalism:

-         Inherently, and unavoidably ALWAYS results in centralization and consolidation of capital and other resources, providing fewer choices and reduced freedom to the consumer.

-         Resorts to coercive laws of competition, which ALWAYS requires a growth imperative in order to sustain itself. ONE of symptoms which manifests is the creation of money through convenient quasi corporate/government mergers such as the Federal Reserve Bank, to create a reliable, unfettered supply of CAPTIAL to guess who- the Capitalists.

-         Requires ceaseless expansion of markets to maintain the aforementioned growth imperative using military means if necessary,

-         Requires ceaseless expansion of labor markets to bias surplus value away from the domestic worker, usually presented as a response to regulatory overhang which serves two purposes; a.) It creates a pressure point to reduce domestic regulation of capitalist endeavor, and b.) Provides a plausible excuse as to why all the jobs are disappearing and the ones that remain are at McDonalds.

-         Requires ceaseless expansion in the pursuit of raw materials and other essential resources, using military means if necessary.

-         When consolidated capital reaches a critical mass of assemblage, the target elevates to Government entities, resulting in regulatory and legislative capture, all in pursuit of an unfair playing field to further the profitability of the multi-nationals.

-         Capture of the mainstream media to propagandize the messaging in support of initiatives, ideologies, and political candidates sympathetic to the corporatist agenda.

-         Structural and pathological inability to act a priori with respect to resource allocation, proper regulatory oversight for dangerous for-profit activities, and irresponsible deferral of even basic human rights in pursuit of a profit motive.

Roll all of this up (and more)  and wrap it with a popular culture based entirely on narcissism and Objectivist fiction, and you net out a belief system in the populace that tries, in vain, to support this monstrosity by:

-         Insisting that the only obstacle to getting yours is hard work and honest behavior, which will overcome all adversity.

-         Trying to use inappropriate deduction reasoning methods to deduce why it’s all going wrong.

-         Refusing to recognize even the most obvious of all observations, that the decline of capitalism is intrinsic, and is not caused by external forces, nuances of monetary systems, or governmental overreach. Rather, and here it comes, naively conflating cause with effect, e.g. government policies (some quite destructive) which  are a RESPONSE (and NOT a CAUSE) to an unstable and wilding gyrating free market system that is perpetually on the verge of catastrophic collapse, and left unfettered, will in fact collapse, and catastrophically, EVERY TIME.

-         Valorizing the use of capital, elevating those that exploit others successfully to rock star status, and hold forth those as a shining example of what to aspire to.

-         Denying any effects of global warming or climate change because to do so would recognize an expansion limit, and capital abides no limits. Note the ENTIRE elected field of Republican Representatives and Senators has taken the position against global warming and climate change. Every one.

-         Denying any meaningful environmental consideration, see reasons above.

-         Demonizing the underclass as slovenly, lazy, and undeserving of any middle class existence.

And last, but certainly not least, the compete denial that the sequential assembly of the aforementioned factors leads us from Adam Smith’s 1776 writing to exactly where we are today, every single time.

But other than those minor quibbles- it’s a great system.

Damnthematrix's picture
Damnthematrix
User offline. Last seen 1 hour 58 min ago. Offline
Diamond Member
Posts: 3910
Joined: 08/10/2008
Aren't you being just a bit misleading, leaving out a few facts?

rhare wrote:

Damnthematrix wrote:

For instance, there's much talk about a Carbon Tax at the moment in Australia, but I have worked out that a $26/ton tax on our electricity consumption would add $4 a year to my tax burden...

Ahh, just like any good socialist, you got yours from pludering others.  You've commented about how low your electric bill is because you plunder others to pay for it via massive solar subsidies.  Then you use the fact that your bill is ultra low to point out how little impact a carbon tax would have on you. Surprised

No rhare....  our power bills are in credit not just because we have subsidised PVs, but because we only consume 2.2 kWh/day.  I know plenty of people with 3.5 kW of solar on their roof who STILL have to pay for power because their consumption is so excessive.......

Even if we had no solar power, our bills would be $42 a quarter.  And our C tax would amount to $4 a year.

And in any case, I got the subidies because they were on offer, I just played the game.....

Mike

Vanityfox451's picture
Vanityfox451
User offline. Last seen 1 week 18 hours ago. Offline
Diamond Member
Posts: 1636
Joined: 12/28/2008
Aren't you being just a bit misleading, leaving out a few facts?

rhare wrote:

Damnthematrix wrote:

For instance, there's much talk about a Carbon Tax at the moment in Australia, but I have worked out that a $26/ton tax on our electricity consumption would add $4 a year to my tax burden...

Ahh, just like any good socialist, you got yours from plundering others.  You've commented about how low your electric bill is because you plunder others to pay for it via massive solar subsidies.  Then you use the fact that your bill is ultra low to point out how little impact a carbon tax would have on you. Surprised

 

Rhare,

it's all swings and round-a-bouts, or bread and circus's for the masses my friend. Just like the $1.5 trillion dollars from half the US income-tax bill that promotes a socialised military. From a country that uses the magnanimity of digitally created out of thin air dollars to pay for the scarce resources from foreign lands via wistful use of entropy and entrapment, that in many cases were taken first by "coup d'état" - also known as "Coup", "Putsch" or "Overthrow" - in other words by using (legalised?) "Illegal Force" and the way of the "Plunderer" State, by setting standards by laws that are (so far at least) bent in your favour.

Three quarters of the energy burnt in the States today was gotten there over time - mostly at the point of a gun - so that you could be a part of the party that became wealthy enough to afford the sustainable solar system that supplied the hot shower you bathed in, and the burned toast you ate for breakfast this morning.

Welcome to the bigger picture. Any which way you look at it, it's called hypocrisy, and if you dig as deep as this, that includes me too ...

Save your chide, I'm laughing too loud ... Laughing... !!!

~ VF ~

__________________

Helen Caldicott ~ If You Love This Planet ~ A must see lecture that is perfect for our time ... http://www.nfb.ca/film/if_you_love_this_... - Rise like Lions after slumber - In unvanquishable number, Shake your chains to earth like dew - Which in sleep had fallen on you - Ye are many - they are few - Shelley

Damnthematrix's picture
Damnthematrix
User offline. Last seen 1 hour 58 min ago. Offline
Diamond Member
Posts: 3910
Joined: 08/10/2008
Huh?

darbikrash wrote:

Really? The US is not Capitalistic? It’s just hilarious listening to the sincere protestations that what we really need is more Capitalism in America, because you know, what just happened to us in 2008, you see, this had nothing to do with Capitalism.

<SNIP>

But other than those minor quibbles- it’s a great system.

Thanks for that......  a much better reply than I would've mustered!  Americans have the Capitalism they deserve.  Capitalists way back in 1913 decided this, and now you have to live with it.  I prefer to deal with reality, or reality deals with you.

Mike

Vanityfox451's picture
Vanityfox451
User offline. Last seen 1 week 18 hours ago. Offline
Diamond Member
Posts: 1636
Joined: 12/28/2008
All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace

Darbikrash,

Mannnn!!!! Brilliant, just brilliant!!!!!!

I was writing my last post while you sent yours in!!!!

I needn't bother linking you to my latest Adam Curtis thread I created today. You could just as well be he himself!!!!!!

Much Respect,

~ VF ~

__________________

Helen Caldicott ~ If You Love This Planet ~ A must see lecture that is perfect for our time ... http://www.nfb.ca/film/if_you_love_this_... - Rise like Lions after slumber - In unvanquishable number, Shake your chains to earth like dew - Which in sleep had fallen on you - Ye are many - they are few - Shelley

Damnthematrix's picture
Damnthematrix
User offline. Last seen 1 hour 58 min ago. Offline
Diamond Member
Posts: 3910
Joined: 08/10/2008
doing the right thing at gunpoint?

gregroberts wrote:

"there are loads of socialists there too, I have been following some of them, with some admiration I might add,"

 For someone who does not like guns, you sure like to use them to force people to do what you think is good. (indirectly by using the govt that is).

Not this again.........  Greg, I frankly don't care what you think.  I wasn't going to reply to this inflamatory post and even considered flagging it, but AFAIC, people who don't "do what [I] think is good" will simply not survive.

I don't need a gun, that's why I don't have one.  please go away.

rhare's picture
rhare
User offline. Last seen 1 hour 54 min ago. Offline
Diamond Member
Posts: 1016
Joined: 03/30/2009
If you say something enough does it become true?

Damnthematrix wrote:

Thanks for that......  a much better reply than I would've mustered!  Americans have the Capitalism they deserve.  Capitalists way back in 1913 decided this, and now you have to live with it.  I prefer to deal with reality, or reality deals with you.

Hmm, let's see signed into law by Woodrow Wilson a leader of the progressive movement (socialist lite).  Oh, let's see JP Morgan (also a progressive) major involvement.  Gee, all these capitalists, oops - wait progressives.  Calling the FED a capitalist institution is just plain delusional.  Manipulation of the money supply completely destroys the root of capitalism, without a sound currency, everything else is faulty as we are now seeing.

Damnthematrix wrote:

I prefer to deal with reality

Wow, you had me fooled!

But you, VF, Darbikrash have all shown your arrogance to your fellow human beings.  I guess you feel you will all be among the chosen elite in the socialist movement since you all seem to enjoy telling others how they must live, as opposed to trying to educate people and allow them to make their own choices.

A nice article was on biggovernment.com today nicely covering the arrogance of those in the progressive movement:

The Audacity of Progressivism

Damnthematrix wrote:

Not this again.........  Greg, I frankly don't care what you think.  I wasn't going to reply to this inflamatory post and even considered flagging it, but AFAIC, people who don't "do what [I] think is good" will simply not survive.

I don't need a gun, that's why I don't have one.  please go away.

Arrogant, dismissive, and abusive, doing quite well all in one post...No confusion on your view of those you deem to be below you.

Damnthematrix wrote:

I don't need a gun, that's why I don't have one. 

FYI - gregroberts was referring to your advocating the force of goverment (the gun - which they have and use if you don't comply).  Hmm, another good place for a link to my favorite article on this subject:

Button Button

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.