Register for Free
Post comments, receive updates via email, gain access to exclusive content, and more.
Spam Safe!
The problem with a deflationary collapse of a credit bubble is that everything that worked for you on the way up works against you on the way down. It's sort of like Judo gone wrong.
- Where rising levels of credit masked poor business decisions and models, shrinking credit will expose them.
- Where credit led to more credit, defaults will lead to more defaults.
- Where optimism fueled the ride up, pessimism will drag it back down.
The difficulty for the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department (and soon, Obama) is that all the big solutions with the big numbers being thrown at the big problems are insufficient. The stimulus is not reaching the right places – it’s getting stuck in the big institutions.
So even as prodigious amounts of money are being created and applied to “the problem,” the evidence suggests that their efforts are not working down on Main Street.
The reason for this is very simple – it is not possible to solve a crisis of solvency with liquidity. It is not possible to fix a crisis of malinvestment with the purchase of bad debts.
Here’s one example. Take retail store space. On the ride up, malls were developed at a furious pace. By every definition or comparison, the US overbuilt capacity in this sector by a very large amount. Given this, what’s going to happen next when this malinvestment is exposed? Well, we don’t have to wait to find out the opening notes of this symphony.
Retailers Will Face Darwinian Fight as Losses Mount
Dec. 18 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. retailers will face a Darwinian fight for survival next year as they run out of cash as early as January and competition forces thousands of store closings, according to private-equity buyers and restructuring experts.
Probably 50,000 stores could close without any effect on consumer choice, Gregory Segall, a managing partner at buyout firm Versa Capital Management Inc., said yesterday during a panel discussion held at Bloomberg LP’s New York offices.
“The United States is massively over-stored in all categories,” Segall said. He said his firm is in “a wait mode” and he expects banks to squeeze retailers after Jan. 1.
The answer is that retail companies will go out of business, stores will become vacant, and the Federal Reserve will find themselves buying up a lot of the failed mortgage notes and exotic derivatives built out of commercial real estate debt, if they haven’t already.
But how does this help? The debts are going bad because they represent a bad business decision, undertaken because of false price information, flashed by the mega-credit bubble, spawned by the meddling activities of the Federal Reserve.
The stores are going out of business because the vaunted consumer has left the store and isn’t buying anything. The ripple starts there and spreads throughout the system, knocking debt pillars out at every step of the way.
As consumers cut back, inventories pile up, and then the production gets cut at the factories. In turn, their suppliers feel the burn and have to cut back.
The fear for the Fed is that once this dynamic takes hold, it can develop a life of its own that is extremely difficult to control. Here are two examples of this dynamicat play:
The Consumer Electronics Inventory Glut
Automakers aren't the only ones halting production as inventories pile up. The consumer electronics industry is also coming to grips with rising stockpiles of unsold goods that are likely to result in price pressure and falling profit.
Recent evidence of growing inventories came Dec. 15, when SanDisk (SNDK), a maker of memory cards and storage drives, said it will temporarily stop production at two Japanese plants for two weeks through Jan. 12. After that, the factories will resume work at 70% capacity.
SanDisk hopes the cutbacks will help it whittle away at the piles of unsold devices in warehouses and on retailers' shelves.
Bracing for the Global Downturn
Last Friday, the world came to a standstill in Sindelfingen, a town located near Stuttgart. On normal days, about 1,500 trucks and 52 rail cars arrive at the Mercedes plant in Sindelfingen, carrying steel and glass, tires and dashboards, headlights and seats. More than 36,000 employees pass through the factory gates every day to develop new models and assemble the current ones -- the Mercedes C, E and S classes. On normal days, at least 1,500 cars roll off the assembly lines at the plant. But what is normal nowadays, with new reports on the recession coming in each day?
Now the Mercedes plant is closed -- until Jan. 11. Production facilities worth billions have been shut down. Everything, from the paint shop to the welding and production robots to the assembly line itself, has stopped moving.
The worry here is that the economy will hit stall speed, at which point its downward momentum just feeds on itself ruining banks, companies, lives, and even countries.
The whole chain comes to a halt and then morphs into a vicious cycle, where cutbacks lead to job losses, which lead to reduced economic activity, which lead to cutbacks, and so on, down and down, until some sort of a bottom is reached.
Typing “Production Halt Slowdown” into Google and constraining the results to the past month yields 150,000 results from all over the world.
We’ve recently seen headlines about 20%+ export declines for Japan and a shipping index that does not even cover the cost of the fuel and the crews, let alone debt service and insurance. We've heard about Rio Tinto, the mining giant, laying off 14,000 workers. We've seen the record declines in spending and capital investment.
Taken together, we have many more signs that the game is being lost by the world’s central banks than signs of progress.
Whether this can be fixed with another few hundred billion, or even a few more trillion, tossed in the general direction of a few well-connected Wall Street banks is highly questionably at this point.
Given that neither the Fed nor the Treasury has displayed any real understanding about the roots of this problem, it would be wise to prepare for a protracted slowdown and a possible hard landing.
We are very close to stall speed.
- cmartenson's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 6203 reads
Print








Comments
Great info Chris.
Here is something worth reading from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
There are two parts:
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/12/dangerous-virus-rapidly-spreading-globe.html
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/12/fiscal-insanity-virus-rapidly-spreading.html
formerly posted under the pseudoname 'gggdude' better picture coming soon!
Secret Organizations and Hidden Agendas
http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/pdf/futurecalling2.pdfDays of Infamy
http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/pdf/futurecalling3.pdf
The War on Terrorism
http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/pdf/futurecalling4.pdf
Greg
I previewed this post and can't get the spacing right, sorry.
Assuming we are in deflation as we speak (according to Mish we seem to be) what happens if we stall? The scenario Chris posits sounds like a deflationary plummet (depression?). What should we expect in terms of the dollar, price of gold, markets, etc.?
Hi Greg,
Thanks for posting the G. Edward Griffin lectures. I have read only one, so far....it was pretty long. I must say that I do align myself with his individualism vs collectivism stand. There is one thing that bothers me. If I am understanding what happened recently, there was no government oversight of certain activities, and this resulted in some dishonest folks doing things that took advantage of others. How could we, as individuals, have monitored these things and stopped them? Or, was it okay for the individuals, who created the mess, to do so because it was their individual right to do so? It seems to me that some short of balance (and I don't pretend to know the balanced), is required.
If I can join with others to hire cops to do certain things on my behalf, why isn't it reasonable to join with other individuals to "hire" other kinds of government to do things for us? And, I might add, why is it not also okay for we individuals to overpower the bums who did not look out for our individual interests, but were also in on the take?
Seems to me it might be about time for a powerful revolution! And, according to Mr. Griffin, and what he says the Constitution says, that might look like a war! Do you suppose the time will come when individualistic thinkers in this country will rise up and overthrow this crooked, privately held regime? Or, have we waited so long now that their power can never be overcome? And, by the way, if we did rise up and overthrow the bums, what are the odds of us putting in others who would be any better?
Chris, great article. Its so scary to read about all these suppliers temporarily (?!) shutting down production, and to contemplate where this all may be headed. It gives one a sense -ok, a chill- of just how serious the current situation is.
Gabriel, thanks for the link to the Mish articles. What a great analogy!
"Do what you can, with what you have, in the time you have, in the place you are." - Nikosi Johnson
Hi Ben,
I found those links on G. Edward Griffins website called Freedom Force International, you might find his site interesting.
No right can violate another right so no it was not okay what those people did, part of the problem is the regulators are in the criminals pockets, it's as if Don Corleone moved his outfit to Washington instead of Nevada. Gotta go, will try to answer your questions tomorrow.
http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/
Greg
Assuming we are in deflation as we speak (according to Mish we seem to be) what happens if we stall? The scenario Chris posits sounds like a deflationary plummet (depression?). What should we expect in terms of the dollar, price of gold, markets, etc.?
Who cares..... where will you get your food from when the supermarket shelves are empty?
Take the Red Pill....
Peace on Terra http://damnthematrix.wordpress.com/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roeoz/
Thank you Chris
I've seen empty shopping malls in my area and more with unfinished construction for some time. This ongoing proliferation has seemed so wrong to me that it's hard to believe it's taken any "experts" by surprise that something's out of kilter here.
Your clarity and use of examples from the real world make your points (as well as the Crash Course overall) accessable and appreciated for those of us who are way outside our comfort zones when dealing with the current financial mess.
* Greg - try this forum for discussion on getting the Crash Course ideas to a wider audience.
http://www.chrismartenson.com/forum/awar...
yikes - can't seem to figure out the HTML link but you can find it if you type awareness into the search area.
Chris,
In the midst of this mess, I wonder what SHOULD the government be doing? It is easy to criticize all of the government spending as just layering public debt on top of bad private debt. However, doing nothing is probably not a good plan either. Doing nothing lead to the default of Lehman Brothers, which precipitated the closest thing we've had to a major systematic meltdown.
I personally think that the Fed's buy-up of long term treasuries is an interesting and powerful tool that they are using. Clearly, the goal is to get long term rates to drop - so that ARM resets will be harmless, thereby forstalling yet another leg-down for housing. This could limit the damage on the leading edge of the default wave.
Certainly more stringent conditions on the dollars going to the banks should be required, and perhaps a more selective process where the most egregiously insolvent banks are shut down by the FDIC rather than bailed out. And if we are going to spend money to keep unemployment from rising into the stratosphere, then the projects should be a long term investment rather than a make-work program.
It seems to me that the challenge ahead is to ratchet down the economy in response to diminishing natural resources. Is it perhaps possible to do that through successive deflationary episodes, interspersed by short periods of recovery? You stress the inflationary aspects of government spending, which cannot be denied if they are out of line with the GDP. But in a deflationary episode the total money supply should shrink as debt and money annihilate one another. A world-wide Japanese style stag-deflation may be just what we need to counteract peak-everything.