Register for Free
Post comments, receive updates via email, gain access to exclusive content, and more.
Spam Safe!
In the course of his info-scouting, Chris has conversations with many different thinkers. Some are well-known to you; others perhaps less so. An important objective of our podcast interview series is to expose our listeners to the variety of voices and points of view that Chris considers when developing the perspective that he brings to his reporting.
David Collum may be a new voice to many of you. Like Chris, David came to the field of macroeconomic study from a scientific background. Again like Chris, his published observations and predictions have begun to amass a readership built on respect for his emprical approach to projecting the future. For those of you unfamilar with David's work, we think you'll enjoy having this insider's ear to his recent recorded discussion with Chris, which covers a wide range of topics.
In short, David sees a world where market risk has been removed (through misguided government intervention), leading to perverse behavior. In many ways, we are repeating the sins of past empires - and he warns us that history has a much higher incident rate of soverign insolvency than we may want to believe.
Click the play button below to listen to Chris' interview with David Collum:
Download/Play the Podcast
Read the Transcript of the Podcast
Report a Problem Playing the Podcast
In this podcast, David and Chris discuss:
- The odd state of seeing reality through a different lens than the majority. How does one tell when the minority opinion is actually the more accurate one?
- The unprecendented flood of global credit (which David calls "debt without borders") that, when combined with the unfunded liabilities many countries are saddled with, presents the epitome of an unsustainable financial system. Sovereign insolvency is much more common in history than we believe, and we are likely to see much more of it in the next decade than we have in the several preceeding ones.
- The inflation/deflation debate. Will things end in default (the "eat-and-dash" outcome) or massive money printing? David and Chris agree that it looks increasingly like the inflationists will win out.
- How our financial system has stopped pricing risk, creating dangerous asset bubbles and bad incentives, and resulting in truly detrimental decision-making.
- The systemic rot than needs to be purged before a more 'healthy' recovery can emerge. Today's ills of rampant lying/fraud, magical accounting, Teflon bankers, and torpid citizenry must be dealth with. Too few (who often don't comprehend the extent of their actions) are determining the fate of too many. The lack of checks and balances as well as real leadership add to the burdens we currently face in addressing these issues head on. We're not yet taking the rational steps to correct the system.
As with our recent interviews with Joe Saluzzi, Jim Rogers, Marc Faber, and Bill Fleckenstein, David ends the interview with a look forward: History is repeating itself, and we are approaching an inflection point that will be forced on us by economic & natural limits. Real risks are increasing; the most concerning are a bond market revolt, resource shortages. and social unrest. Rampant inflation and taxation will likely define the next decade. At our current trajectory, if we don't take great steps to change our behavior, things have a high probability of ending poorly.
David B. Collum is a professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Cornell University. In addition to his academic interests, Dan authors an annual macroeconomic assessment. He recently published his 2010 Year In Review: Fugly Gives Way To Muddling.
- Adam Taggart's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 6854 reads
Print








Comments
Wow what a great interview & content. Interesting only a 20% chance of a currency crises in the next 10 years if I heard this right? Guess a betting person would be wiser to go with the higher odds of 80% of it not happening.
Another reinforcing voice to what we all see. Thank you Chris for introducing David to your followers. Let us all know the answer on whether the energy component increase of other goods is taken out to calculate CPI .
We admire what you are doing. We follow you daily along with a host of others, and as Canadians we keep asking when will Americans say " Enough!". The blatant corruption in the system is astounding. I agree with David that this kind of self aggrandizement has been seen throughout history - but sooner or later others caught in the behavior try to eliminate it. Sadly this universal story of human being's self interest is being played out on a grand scale this time around, affecting us all no matter where we live.
"Fugly"?? Is that a technical term?
This past week has been difficult for me. Didn't know why until I read the summary of the interview:
About 10 individuals I deal with are on board. Everyone else thinks I am nuts. The minority opinion is more accurate. Period
Nate,
We have all gone through that issue and we will all probably continue to go through that for some time to come.
You are not alone.
Yes, it is hard.
Much evidence of crumbling is building now. In some wierd sense, it's encouraging.
Hugs ... dons
Broomfield, Colorado, USA
In the interview David noted that he was hedging his bets with regards to protecting his assets. He noted physical metals, as one venue, but hinted at others that he would not mention.
Without divulging what he is doing and assuming that we do not know, does anyone have any insight as to what other mechanisms there are out there to keep one's assets out of the hands of over reaching and very hungary government?
You will find numerous ideas about "assets" and "true prosperity" in the "what should I do" series.
Broomfield, Colorado, USA
Hugely enjoyable and informative interview... loved the humour !
I find it interesting that a hard science background seems compatible with accurately seeing the fundamentals of a situation as opposed, to say the blinkered, professional orthodox, modern economist.. (notable exceptions - eg Steve Keen)..
This past week has been difficult for me. Didn't know why until I read the summary of the interview:
About 10 individuals I deal with are on board. Everyone else thinks I am nuts. The minority opinion is more accurate. Period
The hardest part for me (as I'm fortunate enough to have a certain critical mass of people in my life who Get It -- enough to keep me from wondering if I'm raving nutters) is to look the people who think *I'm* nuts in the eye and feel compassion. Not an easy thing to do.
"Show some !@#$%^ ADAPTABILITY!!" -- Sergeant Jack Shaftoe, USMC ("Cryptonomicon")
"It's all goin' *down*, man! Martha Stewart's polishing the brass on the Titanic!" -- Tyler Durden
"Have the courage to use your own understanding!' -- Immanuel Kant
"Dreams are the seedbed of the possible." -- William Greider
"One day you finally knew what you had to do, and began, though the voices around you kept shouting their bad advice." -- Mary Oliver
Thomas is my pseudonym. I am the guy in the interview (Dave). With that out of the way, I have found that personality type dictates people's receptivity to new (sometimes disturbing) ideas. I seem to be prone to embrace them (possibly to a fault). Others will embrace ideas that challenge their notions of the world with difficulty at best (especially when it requires declaring that one or more experts must be dead wrong). Often we feel a missionary zeal to share our new-found epiphanies with others who do not wish to hear them. CM was so moved that he created the Crash Course. Wow! Many of us just become tedious to friends and family is my guess.